NEIL CORNRICH & NC SPORTS: MANAGING THE CAREERS OF PROFESSIONALS IN THE SPORTS INDUSTRY

SEARCH NEILCORNRICH.COM

Thursday, July 06, 2023

It’s Not Yurcich SZN for 247 Sports

 



























by Joey Lovell
22 hours ago (July 5, 2023)

 

Don’t feel bad Kaytron Allen, you’re not the only one at Penn State getting snubbed. In a recent article discussing the top 15 quarterback developers in college, Penn State’s offensive coordinator/QB coach Mike Yurcich was completely disrespected when he didn’t even make the list. The level of bias towards Penn State knows no boundaries.

 

Who coached Jalen Hurts?

No fewer than three coaches in this list were credited with the development of the current Philadelphia Eagles signal caller. The article mentioned both Lane Kiffin and Steve Sarkisian as helping with Hurt’s development in his time at Alabama, and then when Hurt’s transferred to Oklahoma, he flourished under Lincoln Riley.

 

Jalen is an incredible talent and I have no do whatsoever that he learned from each one of those men. But using him as an example for three different coaches seems a little excessive.

 

The System Makes the QB 

Chip Kelly makes the list, largely in part because of his incredibly successful system that took athletic quarterbacks and had them producing video game numbers during his six seasons at Oregon. He was credited with developing Dennis Dixon, Jeremiah Masoli, Darron Thomas, and of course Heisman Trophy-winning Marcus Mariota. Both Dixon and Mariota made the NFL, but Dixon threw 58 passes in three seasons (although he did get a Super Bowl ring with the Steelers) and Mariota is still in the league but has definitely failed to live up to his hype. Masoli is still playing in the CFL and Thomas bounced around a little up there and the Arena league.

 

Kelly attempted the NFL challenge on his own, and after two moderately triumphant seasons during which he gradually dismantled the team that Andy Reid had constructed over 14 years, he was dismissed following a disappointing 6-9 performance in his third season, not even getting the chance to finish the season. San Francisco took a chance on him but quickly came to rue that decision when he managed a dismal 2-14 record. This serves as a reminder that college offensive systems don’t always transition effectively to the NFL.

 

Bobby Who??

O.K., I admit, I know exactly who Bobby Petrino is, although I confess I didn’t know he coached at Arizona State when Jake “The Snake” Plummer was there. Yes, he did coach Lamar Jackson when he won the Heisman, and he even coached the late Ryan Mallet while he was at Arkansas, which oddly wasn’t acknowledged in the article. But does that qualify him to be listed in the 11th position? I don’t believe so.

 

The biggest grievance of them all

O.K., I’ll be the first to admit, my feelings toward Ohio State are similar to my hatred of liver and snakes. However, just as Wes Mantooth was telling Ron Burgundy when saving him from the pit of bears “I pure straight, straight hate you…but G*^####&t I respect you”, so goes my feelings towards the Buckeyes. I happen to think that Ryan Day is a good offensive mind that has overseen some good collegiate play. For example, in 2019, OSU’s QB Justin Fields also put up video game numbers. The funny thing is, guess who was the quarterback coach and passing game coordinator for that season? None other than Mike Yurcich. So, who do you think had a bigger hand in the success of that year?

 

Yurcich’s own resume

Besides the aforementioned job with Fields, he was the OC/QB for the Oklahoma State Cowboys from 2013-2018. During his time there, the Cowboys’ averaged scoring 38.0 points per game. Mason Rudolph, a 3-year starter, left the program as the undisputed passing leader in every statistical category, by wide margins. For his career, he threw for 13,618 yards with 92 TDs against 26 INTs.

 

After his one incredibly successful season in Columbus, Yurcich went down to Austin during the Covid season to be Texas’s OC/QB coach. Sam Ehlinger put up very solid numbers in a 10-game schedule, finishing the year with a 150.7 QB rating.

 

















Perhaps the most validating example of Yurcich’s genius is what he accomplished while at Penn State. When Sean Clifford came to Happy Valley, he was a four-star recruit that much was hoped for. There were some glimpses of that talent, but for the most part, he was average his first two years as a starting quarterback for the Nittany Lions. In Yurcich’s first season as his play caller, Clifford experienced his best year-to-date, throwing for over 3,100 yards. During his senior season, while not as prolific in the yardage category (2,822 yards) every other metric increased, most drastically. His completion percentage jumped over 3 percentage points. He reduced his INTs, albeit only by one, while increasing his TD passes. His QB rating of 150.5 was the highest of his four years as a starter.

 

The knock against him was he could never win the big game. Yet, he was 2-2 against Michigan in his four seasons as the signal caller. Sadly, while he never did beat Ohio State, in his final two games against the Buckeyes he was 67-99 (67.7%) with four TDs and four INTs. Of course, those were the first two years of Yurchich’s calling plays.

 

Perhaps the most maligned quarterback ever at Penn State, he DID win the Cotton Bowl and the Rose Bowl, not to mention Rose Bowl MVP. While it remains to be seen what his pro career amounts to, the quarterback whose haters “guaranteed” wouldn’t play past college, not only got drafted but went in the fifth round.

 

Conclusion

So, while this list is a good start, without including Mike Yurcich, it is widely incomplete. From working with players that other coaches were credited with, to overseeing the development of two programs’ all-time leading passers, Yurchich’s body of work speaks for itself.

 

Nevertheless, I sense that in the upcoming years, his name will invariably come up whenever analysts discuss Drew Allar’s potential destination in the first round of the 2025 NFL Draft.

 


Monday, July 03, 2023

Peeling Back the Curtain

 


PEELING BACK THE CURTAIN

 Some billion-dollar franchises are still getting away with penny-pinching measures; NFLPA team report cards aim to expose them

 

BY MIKE BEACOM

Photo by Kirby Lee – USA Today Sports

 

Vince Lombardi will forever be credited for popularizing “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing,” even though Lombardi felt his words were taken out of context. The Packers’ legendary head coach of the 1960s clarified sometime later that he had meant to emphasize “the will to win.” Regardless, the overall message remained the same: winning ranks above all else.

But does it still?

This offseason, the Washington Commanders were expected to sell for a record $6.05 billion. The club has not won a Super Bowl since the 1991 season and has claimed only three playoff victories in the 31 NFL seasons since (its most recent in January 2006).

The NFL is a brand — a very lucrative brand — whose teams sell tickets, merchandise and sponsorships, regardless of success on the field. When it comes to the business of pro football in 2023, winning isn’t the only thing; it may not even be the most important thing.

But one thing that did cast initial doubt for the Washington sale was the toxic culture that had been portrayed by media and former players. Turning a losing franchise into a winner can happen in a few seasons with the right changes and a little luck. But turning around a toxic workplace? It’s something NFL franchises have largely neglected up to now.

This offseason, the NFL Players Association released team report cards to assess how well franchises are being run off the field. It was a bold move — one that’s been in the works for some time — and it exposed where teams invest back into the workplace to benefit “the product” that is largely responsible for ever-growing franchise valuations.

Wrote NFLPA President JC Tretter in March to accompany the report: “ ... for the first time, we are peeling back the curtain on issues that we talk about among ourselves as players but have been unable to organize and publish in a centralized way.”

 

SO WHAT’S BEHIND THE CURTAIN?

The more than 1,300 players surveyed were asked to critique their team’s performance in eight categories: treatment of families, nutrition, weight room, strength staff, training room, training staff, locker room and team travel. Players scored each category on a 1-5 scale and were encouraged to provide comments, where applicable. The only team to receive an A rating in all eight categories was Minnesota. Miami received A grades in seven of eight.

There was little correlation between overall team scores and recent on-field success. In fact, the top five-rated teams (Minnesota, Miami, Las Vegas, Houston and Dallas) were a combined 43-41-1 last season, with only the Cowboys winning a playoff game. The Texans’ 3-13-1 record brought the numbers down and the other four teams were a combined 40-28. Here’s a snapshot of some of the feedback collected from players surveyed for the report:

 

• Because the Jaguars do not offer a family

room, players’ wives have breast-fed their

babies on the floor of the stadium’s public

restrooms.

 

• If Cardinals players would like dinner,

staff will box one up, but the team charges

them via payroll deduction (apparently the

only club in the league to do so).

 

• Some Washington players complained

that there is a lack of warm water and poor

drainage in the showers.

 

• Cincinnati’s lockers do not have outlets

for players to charge devices.

 

• The Colts are one of only six teams that

require young players to have roommates

during road trips, and one of seven teams

that do not offer first-class tickets to any

players.

To some, this may sound like entitlement, but others would argue multi-billion-dollar organizations can afford basic amenities for the lifeblood of these organizations.

When he heard of Washington’s valuation, Miami head coach and one-time Washington assistant Mike McDaniel quipped, “Wow, the organization’s worth that much? And I couldn’t get free coffee!?”

Agent Neil Cornrich has been representing his clients’ best interests for more than three decades. For Cornrich, that has always involved looking beyond what’s outlined in the player’s contract.

“We’ve always tried to tilt the playing field toward the player being selected by an organization which optimizes his best opportunity for success and longevity,” he said.

According to Cornrich, many of the clubs he deals with understand that little things can make a big difference in a player’s development and overall happiness. The report cards, he believes, could incentivize the other clubs to step up their game.

“These are $6 billion organizations now. There’s no reason they can’t invest in these areas to make it a healthier work environment.”

 

WILL POOR GRADES LEAD TO CHANGE?

In his March letter, Tretter outlined the three primary objectives of the team report cards: highlight positive clubs, identify clubs that need improvement, and highlight best practices and standards.

Some clubs took offense to the exercise. “They didn’t want help; they wanted shock factor and embarrassment,” one league executive told The Athletic’s Kalyn Kahler this spring.

Motives aside, the team report cards illustrate that NFL players are largely underwhelmed by how much teams are investing in facilities and essential services. One-third of teams received a C grade or lower for their weight room, and one-half of teams received a C grade or lower for their training room. Only four teams received an A grade for their treatment of families.

Still, why should we believe that teams lagging behind the curve will succumb to peer pressure? Washington ranked 32nd in the NFLPA’s first-ever team report cards and the news broke before owner Daniel Snyder received the $6 billion-plus bid — a number more than seven times the $800 million he paid for the club in 1999.

The answer could be the NFLPA’s resolve. NFL management and labor have always been at odds. Prior to the 1970 season, as the NFL and AFL merged into one league and the two respective players’ associations did the same, the players threatened their first strike. But management still had a stronghold over labor, and the players were poorly organized and lacked clear purpose.

“The guess was the players were primarily concerned about pension, insurance, disability benefits and things of that nature,” said players’ union attorney Ed Garvey in 2011. The players made small strides in 1974, 1982 and 1987 until securing the right to free agency in the early 1990s.

That long journey has allowed today’s players to shift their focus from financial objectives to better workplace conditions. It fits the times we live in; a 2018 Gallup poll found millennials value working for an employer who cares about their well-being above all else.

But critics warn that unless players begin to weigh NFLPA report card findings heavily in free-agent considerations, this all will be nothing more than an annual news release.

Cornrich believes it’s something that has always factored into player decisions.

One of his former clients, eight-time Pro Bowl guard Marshal Yanda, was a third-round selection by the Ravens in the 2007 NFL Draft. He spent his entire 13-year career in Baltimore, and many believe Yanda will soon be enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

“He had opportunities twice in free agency to go other places for more money and chose to stay in Baltimore because they were always successful and they treated people right,” Cornrich said.

The Ravens scored favorably in several areas, but ranked near the bottom of the league in the weight room and strength staff categories. Just prior to the report card’s release, the team fired strength and conditioning coach Steve Saunders.

Perhaps more than anything, the NFLPA report cards provide a glimpse into how players feel about ownership. Every Ravens player surveyed gave owner Steve Bisciotti a positive grade, probably because Bisciotti has been one owner who has consistently responded to the needs of his organization.

“It all comes from the top,” said Cornrich. “Eddie DeBartolo is in the Hall of Fame for a reason, and Robert Kraft will be shortly.”

 

WHERE DO THINGS LEAD FROM HERE?

Tretter suggested the NFLPA will collect player feedback annually to measure progress and incentivize teams to invest in the workplace. At least a few teams have pledged they’re prepared to do so.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Chiefs ranked 29th in the report, scoring no higher than 12th in any single category. Kansas City owner Clark Hunt told reporters during 2023 NFL Draft weekend: “Nobody likes criticism, but you know, from my standpoint, feedback is always positive, and so you know we’ll take and learn from it.”

The Arizona Cardinals ranked secondto- last in the report, but owner Michael Bidwill quickly took note. When Bidwill hired Jonathan Gannon to be the team’s new head coach, the two talked at length about improving many of the areas that were later outlined in the report.

“The directive (from Bidwill) was, ‘I want a fresh set of eyes on everything that we’re

doing with football operations, and I want to know between you and (general manager Monti Ossenfort), how it can be better and how we can improve that,’” Gannon told reporters. “So, not really concerned about what went on in the past. I’m concerned about how we move forward to help our team win.”

Later, at the league meeting in March, Gannon said some “big-time changes” had already occurred.

“I’m not going to get too much into it,” he added, “but food, weight room, facilities, contracts, Michael has been fantastic. He came in my office the other day saying he wanted technology (talked about) and graded. We had a couple meetings with the heads of departments and we said, ‘We need this, this, and this; we don’t need this,’ and he’s pulled the trigger on all of it.

“Everything I’ve said that I felt we wanted or needed has come to fruition.” Some have suggested there is a need to refine the next round of the report cards’ criteria and add categories. Said Cornrich, “One thing these report cards don’t mention, which I think they should, is medical staff. That’s different from training staff.”

There really is no limit to what the players can evaluate — practice and playing field conditions, team traditions, community outreach — but ultimately change will come when teams believe that a better work environment is marketable to prospective free agents, coaches and corporate sponsors. Those elements lead to wins, franchise stability and revenue.

Speaking to reporters at the Combine, second-year Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell said his team’s high scores are a reflection of the organization’s commitment to building the right culture and connecting with players.

“Culture is people and it’s something we strive to work on every single day, and I think our players feel that,” O’Connell said.

He added, “One of the things that I look back on a year ago and I think about using words like connecting with our players and the collaboration that goes into what pro football should be at this level. It goes so much beyond those words and people kind of chuckle sometimes as you use some of these cliché-like words; well, they’re not cliché when you go to work every day and try to join with a great group of people and a great support staff at every level of our organization. It’s not a cliché when people make that our mission statement, to provide the premier place to go to work and improve both personally and collectively as a team in our league means a lot to us.”

The Vikings didn’t lure any high-profile talent to the Twin Cities this offseason selling culture, and they aren’t among the favorites to compete for the Super Bowl. But nothing happens overnight in pro football. A few years from now, the March release of the NFLPA’s team report cards could be necessary reading for players heading into free agency.

And while no one is arguing that state-ofthe- art training rooms and first-class tickets lead to more wins, or even higher franchise valuations, what the NFLPA is saying is that taking better care of the players (and those around them) will lead to better management/labor relations and possibly a higher probability for prolonged success in the league.

“Happy, healthy players usually have happy, healthy careers,” said Cornrich. “Everyone should be in favor of that.”


Friday, June 30, 2023

Dallas Clark shares his thoughts on Tight Ends University


Jennifer Lee Chan catches up with Dallas Clark at George Kittle's 'Tight End University' and looks at how special of an atmosphere that San Francisco's TE has created, not just for the 49ers' tight end, but players throughout the NFL.

 


Popular Posts